Skip navigation

Copyright infringement

What is it ?

One or more over-enthusiastic and ill-informed (or malicious) authors who adds content to your wiki that they don't have the right to add can become a serious problem for your wiki. Their behavior, if it is not countered swiftly, can become an epidemic, or make other wiki users feel uncertain and lose trust in the wiki and they may become unwilling to continue contributing. You or your organization may even get sued, especially if the wiki is visible to the global Web.

How do I notice it?

Any of these symptoms may indicate you have a copyright infringement problem:

  • The wiki grows faster than before, without the number of active projects growing.
  • The wiki gets larger chunks of new content than typical.
  • Pages quickly "jump" from stubs to full-length articles.
  • A few users add new content faster than anyone could type (and still get real work done).

To make sure that you really have this problem, cut-n-paste unique expressions from the wiki's new material into a search engine. If there is a copyright infringement, it is very likely that you will find one or more source documents, which are neither public domain nor share-alike.

How do I fix it?

This problem should primarily be prevented with educating the wiki users. The wiki itself can serve as an important education channel: you can, for example, make sure that everyone who edits content gets a warning about posting copyrighted material when they start editing a submission. You can also have one or more pages about copyright on the wiki or link to suitable pages elsewhere.

If a user makes this mistake, first clean up (delete the copyrighted material and note the reason for deletion in the page log). Then leave a message for the user(s) through the normal channels of your wiki (e.g. on their user talk page or via email). Make sure your message is constructive and gives links to the information the user may need to learn what copyright is and why it matters for your wiki.

Example

Would be needed.

Rate this pattern?

Related Patterns

  • Vandal - A vandal may post copyrighted material on purpose, to create extra work for administrators and WikiGnomes
  • WikiTroll - A WikiTroll may e.g. use "content flooding" to dominate a discussion, and some of that content is likely to belong to someone else

In some contexts this can be a significant problem: especially if the Wiki is a publically readable corporate site, where the host can be held accountable for the content.

It's a special case of the more general malpractices Plagiarism and Unacknowledged Sources.

--Matt

While it is a good idea to have an usage policy and to put in place proper user education, it might not be a totally foolproof solution.

There might be some users who are unaware of copyright issues or slipped off the mind. It is also possible to have some rogue users as well.

It will be very tedious to appoint a moderator to scan every posting.

Therefore instead of having the site or the organization to be responsible for it, is it possible to adopt a policy similar to YouTube where the hosting site will remove any objectable materials from the site when it has been informed.

Another useful tool I have used to check to see if text in a Wiki is from another copyrighted source online is CopyScape.com.

http://www.copyscape.com/

Posted by cb at Jun 27, 2008 22:26

Please Log in or sign-up to discuss the pattern.