Critical Mass
What is it?
Establishing an effective Wiki normally requires an active community of contributors. The Viral pattern can lead to a rapid explosion in the number of users, but it is often difficult to generate a "critical mass" that ignites such an explosion. Without such a critical mass, the Wiki will often fall into dis-use.
Tactics
There are two main aspects to attaining critical mass:
- Content
- There needs to be a substantial amount of compelling information that causes people to want to return to the site and tell their friends to join as well.
- Some document repositories can (or should) be wiki-fied. Conversion of those documents would provide both a source of content and contributors who have a stake in the wiki.
- Encourage people to contribute in small chunks, by implementing the "1-minute" model (take no more than 1 minute to write down an idea, suggestion or information and add it to the wiki.)
- (Please add suggestions here about how to generate a critical mass of content)
- Contributors
- There needs to be a substantial number of users so that newcomers can feel part of a community.
- There needs to be some key people who are respected and active contributors.
- One approach in a commercial context is to make Wiki participation part of people's job. For instance, a Services Manager may tell their Consultants that they are expected/encouraged/allowed to spend one hour each week writing up notes on their clients in a CRM (Customer Relationship Management) Wiki.
- Maintaining a strong Community Portal can be key to encouraging participation. If people don't know what needs doing, they are prone to look around a little and then leave. If there's a clear list of things that could be accomplished they are more likely to adopt one of the tasks as their own.
- (Please add suggestions here about how to generate a critical mass of contributors)
rate-9044192-62117
| Rate this pattern? |
|
|
- Viral suggest a mechanism for growth
- Magnet and Lunch Menu both suggest the need for making the initial content compelling
- Seed it with content suggests the need for a substantial amount of initial content
- Champion describes the role of a key leader
Generating content takes alot of work, because lets face it, if the information was easily accessible and available then we wouldn't need to look at your wiki
I wanted to change the article but I wasn't sure my comment was appropriate but we've actually hired someone to develop a seed for the website. He doesn't have to complete a comprehensive seed but enough to build up that starting content.
Yes he is getting paid but if you are not running a corporate wiki then I guess you may just have to be prepared to put in some hard yards with some friends to come up with a solid seed from which to work from because once the seed is out there hopefully that will begin to generate that single point of reference you want so badly, and for the record, after the seed is inplace we are no longer paying people to do the work (I don't want to be a part of a negitive pattern now do I
)